Sponsored Links
-->

Kamis, 30 Agustus 2018

Do Britain's police need more money or more power? - Terror on ...
src: cdn.static-economist.com

The powers of the police in England and Wales are defined largely by statute law, with the main sources of power being the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 and the Police Act 1996. This article covers the powers of territorial police forces only, but a constable in one of the UK's special police forces (most often a member of the British Transport Police) gains those powers while he/she is on loan to a territorial force or discovers an incident which is otherwise outside his/her statutory jurisdiction. In law, police powers are given to constables (both full-time and volunteer police officers). Some police powers are also available in more limited extent to Police Community Support Officers and Traffic Wardens (not to be confused with parking attendants) as such persons are also uniformed staff employed by police forces even though they are not constables.

There are several general powers constables have that normal members of the public do not, including :-

  • the power to detain people in connection with an offence
  • the limited power to stop and search people/vehicles in connection with offences (actual or suspected)
  • various powers of entry to apprehend suspected offenders or execute search warrants in relation to crime
  • the power to seize and retain property suspected to be stolen or evidence of a crime
  • the power to arrest people without warrant for minor offences
  • the power to direct the behaviour of persons and vehicles on highways and in other public places
  • the power to demand name/address and certain documents of anyone driving a motor vehicle on a public road

Mainly with respect to people behaving peaceably in public, the powers have various limits and generally require a clear reason for their exercise which must often be made known to a person threatened with arrest or who has been arrested (a person is generally required to be informed of what wrong has led to the arrest).

Powers to stop and search can be extended on a limited (by place and duration) basis by legislation such as s.60 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 or ss.44-47 of the Terrorism Act 2000.

Once a person has been arrested his/her vehicle or residence can be searched without the need for a warrant to be obtained for the purpose of obtaining evidence connected to the offence causing the arrest, as long as the offence or suspected offence was indictable. This power is provided by Section 32(2) of PACE 1984, which states a Constable has the power "to enter and search any premises in which he was when arrested or immediately before he was arrested for evidence relating to the offence". Constables and PCSOs also have the power under this section to search an individual for items that may assist or facilitate an escape from custody (i.e. an arrest or detention)


Video Powers of the police in England and Wales



Source of powers

The basic powers of Constables derive from the Police Act 1996, which covers attestation (section 29), jurisdiction (section 30) and a number of other matters. A great deal of powers also come from the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 which was one of the biggest Police power reforms in decades. The powers given to PCSOs are provided by the Police Reform Act 2002.


Maps Powers of the police in England and Wales



Detention

There are three different types of detention:

  • detention without arrest,
  • detention after arrest (but before charge), and
  • detention after charge.

Detention without arrest

Detention without arrest is only permitted in certain circumstances, and is not a generally available power as in some other jurisdictions. In addition to the power to detain during a search (as described below) a Constable may detain a person under the following provisions:

Detention after arrest

Where a person is arrested for an offence, they will be taken to a police station. The Custody Officer at that police station must determine whether he has sufficient evidence to charge the detainee for the offence and may keep the detainee in custody until he can make this decision. The Custody Officer has sufficient evidence if he has sufficient evidence to provide a reasonable prospect of conviction. If the Custody Officer determines that he does have sufficient evidence, he must charge the person or release him. If he determines he does not have enough evidence to charge him he must release him unless he has reasonable grounds for believing that his detention without being charged is necessary to secure or preserve evidence relating to an offence for which he is under arrest or to obtain such evidence by questioning him.

In terrorism cases, a person may be detained for a maximum of 28 days. Otherwise (and subject to exceptions), a person may be detained for a maximum of 96 hours from the relevant time (normally the time an arrested person arrives at the first police station that he is taken to), in line with the following restrictions:

On expiry of the time limit, the arrested person must be released, either on or without police bail and may not be rearrested without warrant for the same offence unless new evidence has come to light since the original arrest.

Detention after charge

Following charge, a person may be detained in custody pending their trial or during their trial before sentencing.

Immediately after charge, if the detainee is not released (either on police bail or without bail), he must be brought before a Magistrates' Court as soon as is practicable (first appearance). From this point, the following time limits apply, unless extended by the court:

Treatment in detention

The treatment of suspects held in detention is governed by Code H to the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 in the case of suspects related to terrorism and by Code C in other cases. It is generally the responsibility of a designated Custody Officer to ensure that the provisions of the relevant Code and of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 are not breached.

In particular, a person detained has the following rights; and must be informed of these rights at the earliest opportunity:

  • to have one friend or relative or other person who is known to him or who is likely to take an interest in his welfare told that he has been arrested and where he is being detained; and
  • to consult a solicitor.
  • three meals a day
  • drinks "on demand"
  • eight hours of sleep/rest a night
  • a clean cell

Some or all of these rights may be suspended in exceptional circumstances.


BelieveInBlue - Tinker Taylor
src: i.vimeocdn.com


Search without warrant

Premises

A Constable may enter and search any premises occupied or controlled by a person who is under arrest for an indictable offence, if he has reasonable grounds for believing that there is on the premises evidence (other than items subject to legal privilege) that relates to that offence, or to some other indictable offence which is connected with or similar to that offence. A Constable also has the power, if a person has been arrested for an indictable offence, to enter and search any premises in which he was when arrested or immediately before s/he was arrested for evidence relating to the offence.

People or vehicles

Search without arrest

The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) was enacted to correct problems with the implementation of the powers used by the police. The 'sus' law allowed police to stop, search, and subsequently arrest a 'suspected person' without warrant, reason or evidence. Due to the unfair implementation of this law within the black community, there were riots in some parts of the country in majority black areas (Brixton, Handsworth, Toxteth, Southall & Moss Side) in the early 1980s and "sus" was repealed in 1981. The vast majority of search powers now require 'reasonable suspicion' of an offence to be present. Constables cannot carry out 'consensual' searches of a person unless a power to search exists.

Before searching anyone or anything (except an unattended vehicle), a Constable in plain clothes must identify himself as a Constable and show his warrant card or similar, and a Constable (in uniform or otherwise) must state:

  • the Constable's rank/grade, collar/warrant number, surname and the name of the police station to which he is attached,
  • the legal power being used to conduct the search,
  • that the detained person is detained for the purpose of a search,
  • the object being searched for (if applicable),
  • the grounds for the search, and
  • that a copy of the search form will be available on demand for three months.

Before searching an unattended vehicle, a Constable must leave a notice (inside the vehicle unless it is not reasonably practicable to do so without damaging the vehicle) stating:

  • that the vehicle has been searched,
  • the name of the police station to which the Constable is attached,
  • that an application for compensation for any damage caused by the search may be made to that police station, and
  • that a copy of the search record will be available on demand (if one was made).

The above provisions do not apply to searches under section 6 of PACE or section 27(2) of the Aviation Security Act 1982, which both relate to vehicles leaving goods handling areas where searches are routine.

A search without arrest is unlawful if it appears to the Constable, after first detaining the person or vehicle, that the search is not required or it is impracticable. A person or vehicle may be detained for the purposes of a search for as long as is reasonably required to permit a search to be carried out either at the place where the person or vehicle was first detained or nearby. Whilst in public, a Constable cannot require a person to remove any of his clothing other than an outer coat, jacket or gloves (except in the case of a search under sections 43, 43A or 47A of the Terrorism Act 2000, which additionally permits the removal of footwear and headgear). Recently a group of civil, academic and legal organisations have united to form StopWatch, an organisation that aims to monitor the use of stop and search powers, reduce ethnic dis-proportionality and promote good practice in their deployment. The powers to search are as follows:

-

Search after arrest

A Constable may search a person who has been arrested (unless the arrest was at a police station) if the Constable has reasonable grounds for believing that the arrested person may present a danger to himself or others. A Constable may also (unless the arrest was at a police station) search an arrested person for anything which he might use to assist him to escape from lawful custody, or which might be evidence relating to an offence.

This power is given to officers by Section 32 of the Police and Criminal Evidence act 1984.

A Constable may search a person arrested under section 41 of the Terrorism Act 2000 to discover whether he has in his possession anything which may constitute evidence that he is a terrorist (defined by section 40).

Searches in detention

The Custody Officer must record everything which an arrested person has with him at the police station and may search a person to the extent that he considers it necessary to do so, but may not conduct an intimate search for these purposes. The Custody Officer may seize anything, but may only seize clothes or personal effects if the Custody Officer:

  • believes that the person from whom they are seized may use them:
    • to cause physical injury to himself or any other person,
    • to damage property,
    • to interfere with evidence,
    • to assist him to escape, or
  • has reasonable grounds for believing that they may be evidence relating to an offence.

An Inspector also has a limited power to order a search of an arrested person in order to facilitate establishing the identity of a person, particularly by discovering tattoos or other marks. Where such a search requires more than the removal of the arrested person's outer clothing, the provisions of Code C to the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 relating to strip searches apply.

An intimate search is a search of the bodily orifices (other than the mouth). It should be conducted by a suitably qualified person unless this is impracticable and done in the presence of two other people. An intimate search requires the authorisation of an inspector and may only be made in one of the following circumstances:


BelieveInBlue - Tinker Taylor
src: i.vimeocdn.com


Stop and account

Stop and account", sometimes referred to as "search and account", is a little-known standard operating procedure, rather than a power, of the police, under Recommendation 61 (Rec.61); it is not a statutory procedure like stop and search. It applies to people on foot in a public place. There is no power to force a person to stop, or to detain them. The decision to "request" a person to "stop and account" is left to the discretion of the individual officer; there is no guidance on this. Unlike stop and search, there is no requirement for "reasonable suspicion". There is no actual requirement on a police officer, beyond identifying themself as such; no need to tell the persons stopped why they are being asked to account for themselves, or to say that they are free to leave without answering questions. However, police forces have procedures governing stops. The Metropolitan Police use the acronym "WISER": show Warrant card; state Identify and police Station; explain person's Entitlement to a copy of the stop record; give Reason for the stop. While a record must be made of every stop, there is no requirement for police forces to keep statistics on number of stops or ethnicity of people stopped, according to the College of Policing.

Advice to the public on the West Midlands Police website explains:

Different police forces have different documents, and forms for recording stops. According to the Metropolitan Police the documented stop and account procedure was recommended after the Stephen Lawrence Inquiry found that stopping people informally, as had been the usual procedure, "created a barrier between the police and the community. These stops were not monitored and no records were kept." The Home Office said in 2013 that stop and account was not a defined power set out in primary legislation, but an "important part of on-street policing. ... It constitutes the next step beyond the general conversations officers have with members of the public every day."


Police Powers in England and Wales: L.H. Leigh: 9780406845429 ...
src: images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com


Power of seizure

The main power of seizure a Constable (and PCSO also since 2012) has is provided by Section 19 of PACE 1984. This provides a general power of seizure for anything that has he/she has reasonable grounds for believing was obtained during the commission of an offence and that the seizure is necessary to stop it being concealed, lost, damaged or destroyed. The same section also provides a power of seizure of items suspected to be evidence of an offence.

Other powers also exist, such as customs powers which provide a Constable, Customs Officer or any member of HM Armed Forces or Coastguard the ability to seize, retain and condemn goods under the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979


Cheshire HGV Cops on Twitter:
src: pbs.twimg.com


Arrest without warrant

The only powers of detention that are available to a Constable in England and Wales are discussed above. Whether being arrested, detained or spoken to about an offence or suspected offence, Section 10 Code C of PACE states that the caution must be used. When used in conjunction with an arrest the suspect:

  • must be told that he is under arrest, and
  • must be "told in simple, non-technical language that he could understand, the essential legal and factual grounds for his arrest" including why the arrest in itself is necessary

A person must be 'cautioned' when being arrested unless this is impractical due to the behaviour or condition of the arrestee, such as Drunkenness or unresponsive. There is also a requirement to caution an individual when they are also suspected of a criminal offence but are not being subject to arrest at that time. The caution is:

You do not have to say anything, but it may harm your defence if you do not mention when questioned something which you may later rely on in court. Anything you do say may be given in evidence.

Deviation from this accepted form is permitted provided that the same information is conveyed. There also exists the 'when' caution (above), 'now' caution and a 'restricted' caution. The 'when' caution is generally used during an arrest or interview on the street or at a Police station. The 'now' caution is most commonly used when charging or issuing an FPN or PND.

Persons other than Constables "who are charged with the duty of investigating offences or charging offenders" (e.g. DWP fraud investigators, PCSOs, IPCC investigators, etc.) have a duty to adhere to any relevant provisions of the codes of practice (section 67(9) PACE).

There are three general means of arresting without warrant: firstly in relation to a criminal offence, secondly in relation to a breach of the peace and thirdly for miscellaneous purposes.

Criminal offences

Prior to 1967, the only general power of arrest for offences was that which existed for felonies. In 1964, Home Secretary Rab Butler asked the Criminal Law Revision Committee to look into the distinction between felonies and misdemeanours, and their recommendation was that the distinction be abolished, as it was obsolete. As most powers of arrest relied on the offence being a felony, a new set of arrest criteria were introduced by the Criminal Law Act 1967, which created the arrestable offence (defined as an offence where an adult could be sentenced to imprisonment for five years or more).

These arrest powers were later re-enacted by the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE), which also created an alternative set of arrest criteria (the "general arrest criteria") which applied in particular circumstances, such as where the person's name or address were not known. As time went on, the number of offences that were defined as "arrestable" grew significantly, to the point where the distinction was becoming confusing and unworkable.

In 2005, the PACE powers of arrest were repealed by the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act, which also abolished the arrestable offence and instead replaced it with a need-tested system for arrest which applied to every offence.

A Constable may therefore arrest (without a warrant):

  • anyone who is about to commit an offence, or anyone whom he has reasonable grounds for suspecting to be about to commit an offence,
  • anyone who is in the act of committing an offence, or anyone whom he has reasonable grounds for suspecting to be committing an offence, and
  • anyone who is guilty of an offence or anyone whom he has reasonable grounds for suspecting to be guilty of an offence.

Additionally, if a Constable suspects that an offence has been committed, then:

  • anyone whom he has reasonable grounds to suspect of being guilty of it.

Conditions (a.k.a necessity test)

Under Code G of PACE, a Constable may only use the powers of arrest given above:

(a) to enable the name of the person in question to be ascertained (in the case where the Constable does not know, and cannot readily ascertain, the person's name, or has reasonable grounds for doubting whether a name given by the person as his name is his real name),
(b) correspondingly as regards the person's address,
(c) to prevent the person in question:

  • causing physical injury to himself or any other person,
  • suffering physical injury,
  • causing loss of or damage to property,
  • committing an offence against public decency (only where members of the public going about their normal business cannot reasonably be expected to avoid the person in question), or
  • causing an unlawful obstruction of the highway;

(d) to protect a child or other vulnerable person from the person in question,
(e) to allow the prompt and effective investigation of the offence or of the conduct of the person in question:

  • when interviewing the suspect on occasions when the person's voluntary attendance is not considered to be a practicable alternative to arrest, because for example:
    • it is thought unlikely that the person would attend the police station voluntarily to be interviewed;
    • it is necessary to interview the suspect about the outcome of other investigative action for which their arrest is necessary;
    • arrest would enable the special warning to be given in accordance with Code C paragraphs 10.10 and 10.11 when the suspect fails to account or refuses to account for the circumstances where they are: :
      • in possession of incriminating objects, or at a place where such objects are found;
      • at or near the scene of the crime at or about the time it was committed.
    • the person has made false statements and/or presented false evidence;
    • it is thought likely that the person:
      • may steal or destroy evidence;
      • may collude or make contact with, co-suspects or conspirators;
      • may intimidate or threaten or make contact with, witnesses.
  • when considering arrest in connection with the investigation of an indictable offence (see Note 6), there is a need:
    • to enter and search without a search warrant any premises occupied or controlled by the arrested person or where the person was when arrested or immediately before arrest;
    • to prevent the arrested person from having contact with others;
    • to detain the arrested person for more than 24 hours before charge
  • when considering arrest in connection with any recordable offence and it is necessary to secure or preserve evidence of that offence by taking fingerprints, footwear impressions or samples from the suspect for evidential comparison or matching with other material relating to that offence, for example, from the crime scene.
  • when considering arrest in connection with any offence and it is necessary to search, examine or photograph the person to obtain evidence

(f) or to prevent any prosecution for the offence from being hindered by the disappearance of the person in question.

Notes 2A to 2J provide further clarification on the above: In relation to (a) above, where mobile fingerprinting is available and the suspect's name cannot be ascertained/is in doubt, consideration should be given using the power under 61(6A) of PACE (Code D para. 4.3(e)) to take and check the fingerprints of a suspect as this may avoid the need to arrest solely to enable a name to be ascertained.

In the instances above of being unable to ascertain name/address, causing physical injury to himself or other person, offences against public decency, obstruction of the highway, note 2D of Code G states that a warning should be considered before arrest in order to perhaps avoid the arrest or in order to clarify the justification for arrest by way of demonstrating the intent to commit the crime and therefore rebut any defence that they were acting reasonably.

The meaning of 'prompt' under the 'prompt and effective investigation' is held to be reviewed on a case-by-case basis and consideration should be given to street bailing the suspect rather than arresting them.

Voluntary attendance at a police station at a later date negates the need to arrest for the prompt and effective investigation when there is no suggestion that the suspect will not attend and if the suspect's name/address can be ascertained. When the person attends the police station for a voluntary interview, their arrest on arrival at the station prior to interview would only be justified if new information came to light after arrangements were made indicates that from that time, voluntary attendance ceased to be a practicable alternative and the person's arrest became necessary and it was not reasonably practicable for the person to be arrested before they attended the station.

If a person who attends for a voluntary interview decides to leave before the interview is complete, the police would at that point be entitled to consider whether their arrest was necessary to carry out the interview. The possibility that the person might decide to leave during the interview is therefore not a valid reason for arresting them before the interview has commenced. See Code C paragraph 3.16

The necessity test has been held to have been incorrectly applied in the following instances, which are therefore unlawful arrests: Richardson v Chief Constable of West Midlands Police (2011), Alexander, Farrelly et al judicial review (2009).

Breach of the peace

Breach of the peace is one of the oldest, and most basic offences still in existence in England & Wales. It is an offence at common law, not codified, so it cannot be found in any act of Parliament. The power of arrest in relation to breach of the peace is available to anyone (regardless of whether they are a Constable or not), who may arrest without warrant:

  • any person who commits a breach of the peace in his presence, or
  • if they reasonably believe that a breach of the peace is about to occur or is imminent, any person in order to prevent that.

However, the Court of Appeal laid down the following conditions:

  • there must be a real and present threat to the peace justifying depriving a citizen, not acting unlawfully at the time, of his liberty,
  • the threat must come from the person arrested,
  • the conduct must clearly interfere with the rights of others and its natural consequence must be not wholly unreasonable violence from a third party, and
  • the conduct of the person arrested must be unreasonable.

Other powers of arrest

There are few powers of arrest without warrant where an offence is not either known or suspected to have been committed. A Constable may arrest a person:

Absconding or going AWOL
  • who he has reasonable cause to suspect of being:
    • an officer or rating of the Royal Navy,
    • an officer, warrant officer, non-commissioned officer or airman of the Royal Air Force,
    • an officer, warrant officer, non-commissioned officer or soldier of the British Army,
who has deserted or is absent without leave,
  • who is unlawfully at large from a civilian prison, secure accommodation or young offenders institution or military prison,
  • who has failed to answer bail or street bail,
  • who has absconded whilst on remand for a report on their mental condition, on remand for treatment or subject to an interim hospital order under the Mental Health Act 1983,
  • who has absconded whilst being transferred to or from the United Kingdom under a prisoner transfer agreement, or
  • who has absconded from a place of safety to which he has been taken under the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 or from local authority accommodation in which he is required to live, or to which he has been remanded or committed.
Alcohol and driving
  • who has provided a positive sample of breath (or has failed to provide any sample at all) under the Road Traffic or Transport and Works Acts, or
  • who:
    • has been required to provide a sample of breath, blood or urine under section 7 or section 7A of the Road Traffic Act 1988 (that is to say, an evidential, not a preliminary breath test)
    • the Constable believes is over the prescribed limit or is unfit to drive, and
    • is likely to drive or attempt to drive a vehicle.
Other powers
  • to take fingerprints after a conviction
  • who has failed to comply with a conditional caution,
  • who has committed an offence against bylaws made under the Military Lands Act 1892,
  • who he reasonably suspects of being a "terrorist".
  • who he reasonably suspects of breaching any bail conditions

David Icke | RSPCA negotiating with Government to have power to ...
src: admin62b4b.davidicke.com


Reasonable force

A Constable's power to use reasonable force is provided by the following law / statutory instruments:

  • the Common Law
  • Article 2 European Convention on Human Rights 1953
  • Section 3 Criminal Law Act 1967
  • Section 117 PACE 1984
  • "generally acceptable conduct" - Collins v. Wilcock (1984)
  • Section 76 Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008

The Common Law has most recently affirmed the use of force in R v Griffiths (1988), which states that reasonable force is acceptable when there is "an honestly held belief that you or another, are in imminent danger, then you may use such force as is reasonable and necessary to avert that danger". A more general explanation of what is reasonable was also made four years prior in 1984 under Collins v. Wilcock (1984) 1 WLR 1172 DC, which stated that a Constable may use force not otherwise covered by legislation or other law if it they "had been acting within the bounds of what was generally acceptable in the ordinary conduct of daily life".

The European Convention on Human Rights 1953 further states:
"2. Deprivation of life shall not be regarded as inflicted in contravention of this article when it results from the use of force which is no more than absolutely necessary:
a. in defence of any person from unlawful violence;
b. in order to effect a lawful arrest or to prevent the escape of a person lawfully detained;
c. in action lawfully taken for the purpose of quelling a riot or insurrection."

The Criminal Law Act 1967 allows any person to use reasonable force in the circumstances in the prevention of crime, effecting or assisting the lawful arrest of offenders or suspected offenders or of persons unlawfully at large.

The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 provides a power for a Constable to use reasonable force when they are lawfully using a power under the same act.

The Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 further clarified the use of force as per the above, but also reiterated force may still be reasonable if it was influenced by an honestly held, albeit mistaken belief.


BelieveInBlue - Tinker Taylor
src: i.vimeocdn.com


Powers of entry

A Constable (and any other person) has the power, at common law, to enter premises to deal with or prevent an imminent breach of the peace. A Constable may also enter and search any premises for the purpose:

  • of executing:
    • a warrant of arrest issued in connection with or arising out of criminal proceedings, or
    • a warrant of commitment issued under section 76 of the Magistrates' Courts Act 1980
    • a search warrant issued under Section 112 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 in relation to searching and seizing evidence in relation to stalking offences
  • of arresting a person for an indictable offence,
  • of arresting a person for an offence under:
    • section 1 (prohibition of uniforms in connection with political objects) of the Public Order Act 1936,
    • any enactment contained in sections 6, 7, 8 or 10 of the Criminal Law Act 1977 (offences relating to entering and remaining on property),
    • section 4 of the Public Order Act 1986 (fear or provocation of violence),
    • section 4 (driving etc. when under influence of drink or drugs) or section 163 (failure to stop when required to do so by Constable in uniform) of the Road Traffic Act 1988,
    • section 27 of the Transport and Works Act 1992 (which relates to offences involving drink or drugs),
    • section 76 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 (failure to comply with interim possession order),
    • any of sections 4, 5, 6(1) and (2), 7 and 8(1) and (2) of the Animal Welfare Act 2006 (offences relating to the prevention of harm to animals),
  • of arresting, in pursuance of section 32(1A) of the Children and Young Persons Act 1969, any child or young person who has been remanded or committed to local authority accommodation under section 23(1) of that Act,
  • of arresting a person for an offence to which section 61 of the Animal Health Act 1981 (transportation etc. of animals during rabies outbreak) applies,
  • of recapturing any person who is, or is deemed for any purpose to be, unlawfully at large while liable to be detained:
    • in a prison, remand centre, young offender institution or secure training centre, or
    • in pursuance of section 92 of the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing ) Act 2000 (dealing with children and young persons guilty of grave crimes), in any other place,
  • of recapturing any person whatever who is unlawfully at large and whom he is pursuing, or
  • of saving life or limb or preventing serious damage to property (as of 2008 - now a power available to PCSOs)

A Constable also has the power to enter any place in order to carry out a search under section 47 of the Firearms Act 1968.


BBC - Future - The officers who protect Britain's nuclear plants
src: ichef.bbci.co.uk


Other powers

Road checks

A uniformed Constable, PCSO or Traffic Officer may stop any vehicle at any time under section 163 of the Road Traffic Act 1988. However, if a Constable wishes, for one of the reasons given below, to stop all vehicles or certain vehicles selected by any criterion, then they must do so under the power granted by section 4 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984. A road check is normally only authorised by a police officer of the rank of superintendent or above, in which case the restrictions given in the second column apply. However, if it appears to an officer below the rank of superintendent that a road check is required (for one of the reasons below) as a matter of urgency, then he may authorise it himself. In this case, the conditions given in the second column do not apply.

If an officer below the rank of superintendent gives authorisation, it must be referred to a superintendent as soon as it is practicable to do so. Where a superintendent gives authorisation for a road check, he:

  • must specify a period, not exceeding seven days, during which the road check may continue, and
  • may direct that the road check shall be continuous, or shall be conducted at specified times during that period.

If it appears to an officer of the rank of superintendent or above that a road check ought to continue beyond the period for which it has been authorised he may specify a further period, not exceeding seven days, during which it may continue.

In addition to the powers to conduct road checks given above, the police have a common law power to set up road checks and search vehicles stopped at them in order to prevent a breach of the peace.

Removal of disguises

Under section 60AA Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, if:

  • an authorisation under section 60 of the Act (searching for weapons) is on force, or
  • an inspector issues an authorisation under section 60AA on the grounds that he reasonably believes that:
    • activities are going to take place in a certain part of his police area,
    • those activities will involve offences being committed, and
    • to prevent or control those offences it is necessary to order the removal of disguises,

then a Constable in uniform can:

  • require a person to remove any item which the Constable reasonably believes that person is wearing wholly or mainly for the purpose of concealing his identity, and
  • seize any item which the Constable reasonably believes any person intends to wear wholly or mainly for that purpose.

Authorisations apply to one locality only, last for 24 hours, and the inspector who gives them must inform a superintendent as soon as possible. A superintendent can extend the authorisation for a further 24 hours. Failure to remove a disguise when required is an offence.


Oliver Scott Curry on Twitter:
src: pbs.twimg.com


Notes



PCSOs soon able to fine cyclists without lights *or* reflectors ...
src: www.bikebiz.com


See also

  • Constable
  • Police officer
  • Individuals with powers of arrest

BBC - Future - The officers who protect Britain's nuclear plants
src: ichef.bbci.co.uk


References

  • This article contains quotations from Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) Code G, Revised Code of Practice for the Statutory Power of Arrest by Police Officers, which is available under the Open Government Licence v3.0. © Crown copyright.

Hundreds of police officers accused of abusing power for sexual ...
src: static.independent.co.uk


External links

  • Directgov Being stopped, questioned or arrested by the police (Directgov, England and Wales)

Source of article : Wikipedia